(Credit: Michele Wisnudel Spitulnik, changes made for purposes of this project).
These categories are used to
categorize assessment items on pre and post tests. Performance assessment rubrics are also categorized using this scheme. The SCALE Assessment sub-group intends to
use this framework to coordinate design and/or implementation of assessment
instruments (including performance assessments) and analyze student data. Click here
for existing SCALE partner post test items categorized according to this
taxonomy.
|
Level of
Knowledge Integration |
Type of Understanding &
Categories |
Examples of Questions |
|
Specific |
Content |
|
|
|
describing
purpose (relating idea or problem to overarching theme or discipline) |
Why are genetically modified foods something we
should examine/investigate? |
|
|
explanations
(explain phenomena, evidence and anomalous findings) |
Explain this piece of evidence. Describe what ... means. What is water quality? |
|
|
relationships
(cause and effect, correlational, new idea to big idea) |
How are heat and temperature related? How are dissolved oxygen and temperature related? |
|
|
connections
(new information to old ideas) |
Make a connection between this web page and a new
piece of evidence |
|
|
Inquiry |
|
|
|
use
of symbol systems (constructs, interprets and uses symbol systems, uses
appropriate symbol system for different situation) |
What is the graph saying? How does the graph compare to the table? |
|
|
defining
a problem |
What are we investigating? |
|
|
constructing
a method (gathering resources, making a plan) |
How would you find a way to answer the driving
question? What steps would you take? |
|
|
making
justifiable predictions/hypotheses (based on prior knowledge or gathered
evidence) |
Based on your experience when do you think we will
have our next earthquake? What types of fish do you think live in the
Monterey Bay? Why? |
|
|
making
observations (recording information in an organized, repeatable way,
identifying observations that do not fit main pattern, deciding level of
precision) |
What data should be collected? Draw a data table. What data that was not collected be collected? |
|
|
analyzing
data (identifying trends in data as well as outliers) |
Look at the spread in the data. Why do we have so many different numbers?
Why do you think there are some
numbers (data points) well beyond the other numbers? |
|
|
constructing
a model (coherent - clear cause and effect relationships, little
inconsistency, parsimonious, tests and revises model, explaining limits and
assumptions in model) |
Build a model using the following factors - pH,
dissolved oxygen, temperature, macroinvertebrates, nitrates. Explain the cause and effect relationships
between all the factors. |
|
|
constructing
an argument (states a position and defends with evidence, gives attention to
differing positions and contradictory evidence, describes additional evidence
that could be gathered to build better case, show awareness of degree of
uncertainty of findings) |
State a position and defend it with evidence. Take the position that the global climate is
changing and defend it with evidence.
Describe the alternate position that global climate is not changing
and site evidence to support this alternate view. For each argument brainstorm what counter arguments
someone against your position might give. |
|
|
evaluating
an argument (uses evidence) |
A web page says that that the ozone layer is
depleting because there has been an increase in CFC production - evaluate this
argument. |
|
|
communicating
findings (represents findings appropriately for audience, uses appropriate
representations, represents the range of views) |
How would you explain your results to your
classmates? To a town council? |
|
|
Epistemic
|
|
|
|
science
as human construct (scientists use evidence to refine and generate new
theories) |
Where does scientific knowledge/information come
fro? |
|
|
science
as subject to revision and change (tentative nature) |
Does scientific knowledge change? Why or How? |
|
|
purpose
or role of evidence (interpretation of evidence leads to refining or refuting
theories, building new ideas) |
How was evidence used to support the Big Bang
theory? How was evidence used to
support the theory of evolution? How
might evidence be used to contradict these theories? |
|
|
purpose
of models and theories (to build explanations, representations based on
evidence) |
Why do scientists build models? How do scientists revise models? |
|
|
uses
of models and theories by different groups of people |
How might two groups like scientists and
environmentalists use global climate change models differently? Why may scientists and stakeholders disagree? |
|
|
evaluation
of models theories, evidence, limits and assumptions |
What kind of evidence will be most convincing to
your parents, classmates, a scientist? |
|
|
Metacognitive |
|
|
|
monitoring
progress, setting goals, assessing one’s understanding |
Predict how much you will learn in this
course [predict grade, rank in class] Is it better to memorize or understand What is difficult about this project? How did you select this topic for
specialization? What do you need to know to understand
this web page Explain what is confusing about this page,
this argument, this evidence? What do you need to know to learn this
material |
|
|
assessing
group’s effectiveness |
self-reports on levels of (a) collaboration and (b) discussion between partners 2. self-reports on the approach a dyad
was planning to take to address a complex problem. |
|
Targeted |
Relationships between at least 2
types of understandings |
Interpretation Give examples of scientific explanations or models
that have changed due to additional scientific evidence (c and e) Evaluating/Critiquing Question relating to a pivotal case.
Explain how this case connects to the evidence you studied in the project. (c
and i) Critique of claim, web site, or
connection. Which of these connections makes the most sense? Explain. Rate
these connections for accuracy, usefulness, or other criteria… Critique this
claim, web site on the following criteria [fill in] (c and i or e) Devise criteria for evaluating this web site, claim, or connection. (c and e) Critique these criteria for evaluating a
claim. (i and e) Building Connections Underline the connections in this
paragraph. Underline a connection that helps you understand …… Explain why.
(c and m) Which paragraph has the most coherent connections (c and m) Which connection does not contribute to
the argument? (c and i) Connect this web page to something you
have studied in this project, explain the connection (c and m) Build a concept map and explain
connections between ideas (c ) Analyzing Controversies What is the fossil record controversy?
(c and e) |
|
Full |
Relationships between three or four
types of understanding |
How should we respond to the threat of
malaria? (c, i, e) Why are frog populations declining? (c,
i, e) |